this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
528 points (89.2% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
2521 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anamana@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

It works better for me as an app. I don't like my browsers to be cluttered like that. But if it fits your usecase

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why I like Chrome's (and various Chromium browsers') ability to app-ify sites. Will create a .app in MacOS, .desktop in Linux, etc. Launches as what looks like an independent app with its own dock/launcher icon. Utilizes most of their PWA stuff.

Sadly, it looks like Chrome has hidden the option completely in the latest version unless you set a flag that will probably go away in a few releases. Edge makes it pretty clear.

I wish Firefox would bring the feature back. They deprecated it years ago and I use it heavily (only reason/time I use Chromium stuff on most of my machines)

[–] Anamana@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know it from Android and I was using it quite frequently as well. But in my opinion it's better as a website alternative, compared to being a complete replacement for apps. Things are less buggy and more smooth for me that way.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I fail to understand how opening a web site, which is all a browser does, can be defined as 'cluttered', but my use case is security while appears yours is to let corpos rummage through your files.

[–] Anamana@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's inconvenient and disorganized to have it as an extra tab (taking up tab space) or browser window (same symbols), also it runs smoother for me within the app.

but my use case is security while appears yours is to let corpos rummage through your files

I care about UX & seems like I'm not the only one at that. If I would care about privacy and security I wouldn't use discord, but matrix or sth.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

As long as you don't care about security, no problems.

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It works better only because they intentionally hamstring the browser so you'll do exactly that.

[–] Anamana@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not a big fan of conspiracy theories mate

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Me either bloke