Firefox doesn't implement the AudioData API, which is probably necessary for the waveform viewer and cropping tool Discord presents in the soundboard management UI.
Not everything is about Chrome DRM yall.
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
528 points (89.2% liked)
Technology
59219 readers
2821 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yet another experimental API only supported by Chrome. Chrome has always been like this, implementing experimental API that hasn't been finalized yet. You might say they're innovating to support new technologies, but actually it's more like they're doing whatever they pleased, as demonstrated by their removal of jpeg xl support despite web communities plea not to do so (a new more efficient image compression, but not made by Google so screw it), pushing manifest V3 and ad topics, and recent push for web environment integrity API.
EEE yall
load more comments
(4 replies)
Thank fucking people like you. The average Lemmy user just knows everything.
I have seen so many Lemmy users think they are better than Reddit users. Truth is, you are all fucking ass holes you are just different kinds of ass holes.
None of us agree with Google's choices but for fucks sake not everything is because Google chose it.
Sometimes it's just in the damn browser. Like fuck off.
I use Chrome and Firefox and have two different online personas with both.
If you clicked the link. It says experimental technology. It's not mozilla's fault Chrome is adding features that are not standard. Sites like Discord for utilizing non standard API's.
is the other one less touchy?
load more comments
(15 replies)
And their desktop client technically is a browser without omnibar.
Electron is not just a browser. It's more like a native app framework that just happens to use HTML and CSS to render UIs. You can do anything the OS lets you do, not just what a browser environment would let you do.
Electron is an unholy fusion of Chromium and Node.JS. Nothing more, nothing less. It doesn't 'just happen' to use HTML and CSS. It's literally just a browser with most of the default browser UI being hidden. Something like React Native would better fit your definition.
It's not literally just a browser. It's literally just a web engine with a full set of OS calls hooked in. It is not a browser in the same way GNOME is not an OS. A browser comes with a whole lot more than a web engine, so calling it "a browser" is wrong both technically and colloquially.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I'm on my lunch break from working on a React Native codebase, and I wouldn't say RN fits that definition at all... but I think we're just getting lost in semantics.
My point was just that a web app running inside a browser has to abide by the rules and limitations set by the browser, whereas Electron flips that relationship -- your app sets the rules and limitations of what can be done, and the web rendering process abides by whatever environment you create. You can do anything the OS permits. Even from inside a web context, if you want. You don't need a browser-managed sandbox to mediate your interactions with the OS.
But probably Chromium right? They probably didn't make all Discord functions work for Firefox as that would require some extra work probably.
Yes, electron.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I’m a little baffled by this one. File upload isn’t exactly some new HTML5.1 feature or anything. There’s no good reason they can’t have this handled properly.
It’s probably the AudioData API.
I ditched Discord a few weeks ago. I moved to Matrix!
what is this matrix you speak of?
The Lemmy of chat apps but not there yet for video/screen share for multi person rooms
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
codes a desktop OS specific program coded in C just to spite you
To be honest I absolutely hate everything being a browser app.
There's really no reason to be mad at them in this particular instance. Their client is Chromium-based (Electron) so they will optimize their new features for that engine first. There's probably less than 5% users who Discord from browser, let alone Firefox, and I think I'm being generous with that number. Additionally, some things are harder to implement (or even impossible) in native web rather than Electron, that has all the NodeJS integrations.
load more comments
(6 replies)
element / matrix instead
There is FOSS wrapper for discord called webcord, if you have to use discord but want a bit more privacy.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Discord is such an obvious "stay the fuck away from" product.
With the same critical mass of users that most proprietary social media have, unfortunately. You'll be lucky to find certain communities on Matrix at all.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Eventually I can see discord discontinuing their web client to push you users into installing their spyware.
load more comments
(4 replies)
I said 'fuck you" to Slack for similar reasons. Going to same the same to Discord now.
Because firefox doesn't support it? Don't see why it's their fault
They implemented a feature that is only available in Chromium and not part of the web standards yet. It's no different than websites that would only work on IE 20 years ago because of some proprietary Microsoft thing.
Except it's not proprietary, and presumably there's no other way to do it in the browser, so did discord really have a choice other than not implementing said feature?
On top of that, their desktop app uses essentially the same website in an internal browser, so unless they handicap themselves by not implementing anything firefox can't support, I still don't see how it's their fault
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›