this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
538 points (99.1% liked)

Work Reform

9976 readers
48 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 77 points 8 months ago (4 children)

One thing I can say, if I had UBI, I'd try to start my own business.

[–] Cyclist@lemmy.world 70 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that might cut into the billionaires profits, so no UBI for you. Here's a UTI instead.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 8 months ago

That's not a bad deal. Without healthcare or a steady income that's something that'll last a while.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 42 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think the main reason is that if you had an UBI, you'd be way more eager to join a union, strike, or quit a shitty job. They know their fortune is built on labour exploitation, even the supposed 'tech' companies.

[–] solarvector@lemmy.zip 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Other businesses are competition. Arguably worse than quitting that shitty job; not only aren't you willing to work for them for a shitty job/wage, you're making it more likely they'll have to compete for labor and profits.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Tbh I'd just make the 10 millionth indie game company. So in reality I'd probably pull 0 labor lol

[–] Milksteaks@midwest.social 4 points 8 months ago

One thing I can say, if I had UBI, 100% of it would go to my landleech to line his pockets

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

doing what and why can't you do it without UBI?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

I mean presumably because they can't afford the risk of failure?