this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
177 points (96.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5212 readers
587 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
177
2 Charged After Pouring Red Powder Over Case Holding U.S. Constitution | Two activists poured the powder over the protective case to call attention to climate change (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Constitution was not damaged, according to the National Archives Museum, which said that the powder was found to be a combination of pigment and cornstarch.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

Likely because they had to consider the possibility of dangerous chemicals and pathogens.

ETA: Given the nature of the location, they may have even hired an archivist and document restoration specialist as well. And being since it was a government job, that may have been added onto the single bill.

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 27 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Hazard pay for all involved too. Emotional distress and all. You never know what these tree hugging terrorists will do. I keep Tom Clancy Rainbow Six on my nightstand.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Hazard pay

Yeah, I don’t think that the employees who cleaned it up got even a quarter of the money.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I love that book. Hey, Olympics this year, and close to Hereford…

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I manufacture the highest grade of hazmat suit material there is. $1600 will get you an XXL suit. I couldn't come up with a way to make this cost more than say $4k-5k.