this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
338 points (98.3% liked)

News

23311 readers
5258 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Bumble has lost a third of its Texas workforce in the months since the state passed the controversial abortion SB 8 (Senate Bill 8), also known as the Texas Heartbeat Act, over a year ago. This new data point was shared by Bumble's Interim General Counsel, Elizabeth Monteleone, speaking on a panel this afternoon at the SXSW conference in Austin, Texas. The panel focused on the "healthcare crisis in Post-Roe America" and featured women who had both sued and spoken out about the need to have doctors, not politicians, involved in their healthcare decisions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 42 points 8 months ago (3 children)

This seems highly suspicious.

Bumble laid off 37% of their workforce just 2 weeks ago:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-02-27/bumble-to-cut-37-of-jobs-plans-app-overhaul-to-revive-growth

If you read the article, Ms. Monteleone says:

We — since SB 8 — have seen a reduction in our Texas workforce by about a third. Those employees are choosing to move elsewhere,” she told the audience at the event. “There are a variety of laws in Texas that I think many people find incompatible with living a healthy life and being their authentic self,” added Monteleone, suggesting that not all the departures may be tied directly to this specific piece of legislation, but possibly to several other Texas laws or proposed laws that don’t sit well with Bumble’s employees.

Not a word about their decision to cut their own workforce -- some of them are surely part of that "reduction in our Texas workforce" (note how she doesn't say they transferred to other locations, or left the company of their own free will). I guess their huge layoff happened "since SB 8"? cough

It sounds like they are trying to do damage control, by spinning their layoffs into a narrative about TX reproductive medicine laws.

Believe me, I'd like nothing more than to see big companies like Toyota, JP Morgan, and USAA give the finger to Texas. But I don't think Bumble is being honest about this, and I don't think they constitute a blip on the radar of the TX economy.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 20 points 8 months ago

The article is poorly written. Bumble lost a third of its "Texas based workforce" is technically true. That said, most of those employees didn't leave the company, they just left the state. Mentioned in the article is how Bumble is now a "remote work first" company. The way the article is written it makes it sound like a third of Texas staff quit in a year, which isn't what was said in the panel. Add to that the last paragraph of the article which notes that the company has since had to layoff 350 employees due to slowing demand for dating apps amongst younger people but fails to mention that 350 is a third of the company, and the whole message becomes muddy and suspect.

In a single article, two key facts are misrepresented.

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There's nothing to suggest your theory has any merit. And they are laying off globally, so no, this simply is not an attempt to control some narrative.

Not to mention their claims regarding employee turnover are entirely realistic. Who's to say the loss of workforce is not itself a cause for failing to meet their growth predictions, which of course corpos "solve" by firing more people.

But, no, they're making things up whole cloth because there aren't actually any ill effects from Texas enacting regressive, authoritarian bull****.

No, there's no conspiracy here. Texas just sucks.

[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

they are laying off globally

"Globally" presumably includes Texas.

Obvs, I don't have any insight whether they laid off Texas employees at any greater or lesser rate than their global rate, but "a reduction in our Texas workforce" is completely vague, and could refer to layoffs or voluntary departures.

no conspiracy here. Texas just sucks

It's possible that they are trying to distract from the layoffs, AND Texas just sucks. The two are not exclusive.

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Did you finish the article? It has a whole paragraph about their decision to cut their own workforce.

These issues are even more pressing for a company like Bumble which is currently struggling with growth and appealing to a younger audience that seems less interested in dating apps than their older counterparts. The dating app maker posted a weak Q4, with a $32 million net loss and $273.6 million in revenue. It also announced it was letting go of 350 employees after other organizational shifts that saw founder Whitney Wolfe Herd stepping down as CEO and a shake-up in the C-suite, which included the appointment of former Slack CEO Lidiane Jones as its new CEO.

[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Yes, the article mentions it. Ms. Monteleone did not (at least, among items attributed to Ms. Monteleone).

The article is not speaking for Bumble. Ms. Monteleone IS speaking for Bumble.