Technology

59402 readers

2516 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

135

File over App Philosophy (stephango.com)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by starman@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I personally wouldn't recommend obsidian (mentioned at the end of the article), but still, I think the article is worth reading.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PersonalDevKit@aussie.zone 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I wonder this with obsidian also, it is one of the things that keeps me from diving in head first.

It seems a lot of its "powerful" functions are against it's plain text advantage. However I don't really see an easy way around it.

At least at the end of the day you or someone else could write a script to modify the plain text files for the next app.

[–] brenticus@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's tricky for sure. The plain text is great, and all the functionality is built off of plain text (even the canvas!), but replicating the functionality isn't trivial by any stretch of the imagination. Migration is easier because of the text files, but will it be as easy to see the links between notes? Or query all the notes I need more detail in? Or map it all out visually?

I think reimplementing the core obsidian functionality in a FOSS clone would be fun... except I already have a queue of projects and not a lot of time, so here I am complaining instead 🤷

[–] geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Logseq is the obsidian foss clone , worth a try

[–] brenticus@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Logseq is a great alternative. It's very much not a clone, though. It has a different paradigm on how it views notes and the functionality isn't exactly 1:1.

[–] geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Try logseq, it's foss and solves some of these problems. Mostly compatible with files from obsidian

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Does it have a plugin ecosystem like Obsidian?

[–] PersonalDevKit@aussie.zone 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That is the double edged sword though. Get cool features - lose true plain text

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

Who wouldn't want a double edged sword? Twice as good for chopping!

[–] geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago

Yep it does

[–] PersonalDevKit@aussie.zone 1 points 8 months ago

I have heard that name a lot, I will have to give it a go