this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
15 points (89.5% liked)

Selfhosted

40198 readers
735 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
15
TLD and the law (iusearchlinux.fyi)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by woof7939@iusearchlinux.fyi to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hi there, I'm currently looking into renting a domain from cloudflare for convenient access to my hosted services from outside my home. It seems some of the cheapest options for the domain name I want to use are country TLDs (.uk, .us). Does this bind me to their laws in any way? can anyone come at me for hosting (e.g. Illegally downloaded content) on their TLD?

Regardless, is there any reason I shouldn't use cloudflare for this? any drawbacks I should be aware of?

Edit: I should mention I'm currently using duckdns for free and the reason I want to move is that it seems some organizations (like my university and workplace) block duckdns (for reasons beyond me).

Edit 2: So to my understanding there's not a big one, but some risk involved, so I think I'll pay a bit more for a non-ccTLD. Thanks everyone!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you want to host "Linux ISOs" I've heard from a friend that Njalla is the best option. You don't own the domain meaning your personaldetails aren't published and Njalla has a good track record when it comes to protecting their customers.

[–] woof7939@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol that's not it, currently I'm just hosting a Jellyfin instance since streaming services seem to have been going steadily downhill for years now. But that also counts as illegal activity afaik. I wasn't worried up until now since in my country piracy laws aren't really enforced at all (as a kid I didn't even know downloading content was considered illegal), but I thought maybe using a .uk TLD may mean I have to answer to them.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago

For personal use I'd say go with whatever and make sure your Jellyfin server has been locked down. Maybe block anything but your own country IPs as that will lower any risk of scanning. But this is pretty much not necessary for a personal instance.

If you want to share your Jellyfin it depends on how many and how much you trust those you share with. The bigger the risk, the more likely I'd be to order through Njalla and routing through a VPN or the like.

I myself just use my lastname.tld as it's for personal use along with sharing with a few trusted friends. I do though use a ccTLD that is assigned to my country as I feel like I have a better chance at keeping my stuff secure and private.