this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
91 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37705 readers
91 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 54 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

Another issue is that image storage is a huge resource burden, to the point where instance admins will simply purge images periodically to keep their database at a reasonable size. It seems like every time I look at Lemmy posts older than a couple months, the images are broken.

I'm not convinced image support should be built into Lemmy in the first place. Back on Reddit, people relied on external image hosts like imgur for many years, and those worked a lot better than the image system Reddit eventually built in (which is covered in wall-to-wall anti-features like the inability to load a goddamn image directly).

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

We saw what happend with that when imgur and a gif hoster (forgot the name) decided that the free loaders are occupying too much space.

Suddenly the archival troops backed several TBs from imgur.

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 12 points 7 months ago
[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 7 months ago

Yeah, that was certainly not ideal. This is a problem with centralization more than it is with integration. I'd rather see a separate decentralized image hosting service. I feel like an image host and a link aggregation/discussion forum require different skills to develop and run, and it would probably be best to have something more specialized.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 7 months ago

I agree with this. Also Lemmy likes to reformat images when you upload them. Its stupid. I have to hotlink from elsewhere anyway so yeah removing it makes more sense.

It would also help reduce the proliferation of things like CSAM thus reducing admin overhead.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

My instance went down for almost 24 hours yesterday and it's really small, and I post so much I was actually worried I broke it by just using it too much. I don't wanna suck up all of Wander's storage space. 😖

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 2 points 7 months ago

Images should be stored in a distributed storage like the IPFS.