this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
588 points (87.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9389 readers
1053 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If your car gets 30 mpg, then you could drive 30 miles for less than $5 probably. It would be more frugal to drive and have the cheaper cost of living.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

only because it's artificially constructed to be like that for the benefit of the car-oil industrial complex

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No, the roads were constructed so that people could travel from one place to another more easily. They existed before cars did, and people traveled on these old roads with horses and carriages. Many of the roads around where I live (in an area the government designates as rural) have historical markers that describe their history going back to the days of Colonial times.

[–] Boxtifer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah if it's all about money then go that route. You are also forgetting the cost of a car itself needed there which is a ton more than just the $5 cost of gas.

Otherwise walking gets you exercise which is better for your health in the long run and in general; the cafe gives a sense of a "third space" and community and the lack of a car is a ton better for both the environment and traffic which also affects everyone's general health.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is only true if you prefer money over the environmental damage you do.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The minuscule amount of pollution that my fuel-efficient car produces is completely insignificant in the grand scale of planet Earth. So yes I do prefer having money to live on than worrying about that.

You can guilt trip me about my car after you succeed in getting millionaires to ground their private jets and when mega-corporations stop massively polluting everything around the world.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, and throwing a can out of the window on a highway is also insignificant >.>

You have the exact same mentality as those millionaires you complain about.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

I don't have a license which is why I'm not living in MI.