this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
413 points (96.8% liked)

News

23301 readers
3469 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Linked it in another post. But based on your response, we can all rest assured that the facts don't matter.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240316183946/https:/fortune.com/2023/07/06/remote-workers-less-productive-wfh-research/

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"A sample of 26 studies out of 112 potential studies (from various databases, including Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Web of Science database from 2020 to 2022) were used after a comprehensive literature search and thorough assessment based on PRISMA-P guidelines. Findings reveal that the impact of the WFH model on employee productivity and performance depend on a host of factors, such as the nature of the work, employer and industry characteristics, and home settings, with a majority reporting a positive impact and few documenting no difference or a negative impact."

Source

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As I already said, the evidence early in the pandemic, which your study is pulling from, showed a slight increase. Although yours claims a mixed bag. Your link doesn't challenge my claim at all.

I'm pointing to the more current evidence showing the reverse is true and productivity is dropped.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I guess we will have to wait for more studies, the consensus now is that it's beneficial. My personal experience is that I'm happier and working harder than ever.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I provided a study that showed a decrease in productivity. You provided one that said it was a mixed bag. All of these companies think they are better served having people back in the office...

And you're still maintaining the consensus is that wfh is better. Confirmation bias is s hell of s drug.

Should have realized that when you accused me of pulling my opinion out of my ass, you were warning me what you were going to do.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My guy, the study literally says the majority reports a positive impact, and you say it's a mixed bag, yet I'm the one with confirmation bias.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

the study literally says the majority reports a positive impact, and you say it’s a mixed bag

Majority has a different meaning than all.

Plus all those other points I made which show your "consensus" has come from your ass.