this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
208 points (81.9% liked)

News

23259 readers
2967 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Catherine, Princess of Wales, has been diagnosed with cancer and has begun chemotherapy, she announced in a video message on Friday, in which she described the past two months as “incredibly tough for our entire family.”

It comes after a period of intense uncertainty about the health of Catherine, who underwent abdominal surgery in January and largely disappeared from public view as she tried to recuperate.

Like the king, Catherine, 42, did not specify what kind of cancer she has, but asked the public and news media to respect her desire for privacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xhieron@lemmy.world 122 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think the British royal family is a scourge on the earth, responsible for untold amounts of suffering. The UK, British Isles, British people, and world would be a better place without it. I truly hate everything the Windsors stand for, along with their ancestors going back hundreds of years.

But I hate cancer more.

I think it's possible to have complex feelings about this. Nobody deserves cancer. A lot of the kings of England deserve to have had their heads cut off, but none of them deserved cancer, and certainly not this lady who just lucked and schemed and Machiavellied herself into a life of incomparable privilege inside one of the most powerful dynasties still in existence--the same thing anyone would have done given the chance.

Fuck the royal family. But fuck cancer more. I hope she comes out of it alright, because her husband needs to break the British monarchy, and it would be nicer for him if he had his wife with him when he did.

[American here, if it wasn't obvious.]

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 59 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It wasn't obvious. Hating the british royalty doesn't narrow it down, it doesn't even exclude Britain.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 55 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Hating the British royalty actually makes me suspect Britain

[–] Aggravationstation@lemmy.ml 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yup I'm British and I can't stand the whole concept. I'm a republican (don't freak out Americans, that just means I want Britain to be a republic without a monarchy).

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 5 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Yeah i want a free Australia unfortunately until all the old people die it wont happen

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Seems to be a common theme for a lot of the big world issues, honestly.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Lol. A free Australia would mean fixing your government not whining about the monarchy.

[–] Aggravationstation@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

Yup, I'm dealing with the same old people pretty much.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

the issue is that particular demographic is constantly being renewed

[–] JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

As an American, I can tell you that we don't know how to not freak out, and we're liable to shoot you for asking us not to.

[–] Aggravationstation@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

Sorry, I forgot. I must now get shot in the leg as recompense.

[–] borari@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hating the British royalty specifically also makes me think British. I’m quite disappointed more people don’t hate monarchy in general though.

I guess in 2024 nobody believes in divine right, and I recognize that the monarchs in the vast majority of countries with active monarchies have only ceremonial power, but i still struggle to understand how people in the Commonwealth realms, Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, Spain, etc., are cool thinking that some rich fuck is somehow better than them or important in any way just because their ancestor was the last person sitting on the throne when everybody decided they weren’t playing the game anymore.

Is it something where they appreciate the tie to history? Even so why would you want a tie to a history that said your ancestors were intrinsically lesser than just because they didn’t have as much land, as big a sword/army, or as much money to pay off the church?

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Rich leeches with ties to the government rarely stop being leeches unless they're universally hated

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Really ? anyone ? I dig your nuanced opinion, but a life of royalty is close to the bottom in the list of things I want