Technology

59157 readers

2307 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

How well can LLMs solve chess puzzles? (github.com)

submitted 7 months ago by httpjames@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Each LLM is given the same 1000 chess puzzles to solve. See puzzles.csv. Benchmarked on Mar 25, 2024.

Model	Solved	Solved %	Illegal Moves	Illegal Moves %	Adjusted Elo
gpt-4-turbo-preview	229	22.9%	163	16.3%	1144
gpt-4	195	19.5%	183	18.3%	1047
claude-3-opus-20240229	72	7.2%	464	46.4%	521
claude-3-haiku-20240307	38	3.8%	590	59.0%	363
claude-3-sonnet-20240229	23	2.3%	663	66.3%	286
gpt-3.5-turbo	23	2.3%	683	68.3%	269
claude-instant-1.2	10	1.0%	707	66.3%	245
mistral-large-latest	4	0.4%	813	81.3%	149
mixtral-8x7b	9	0.9%	832	83.2%	136
gemini-1.5-pro-latest*	FAIL	-	-	-	-

Published by the CEO of Kagi!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sudoreboot@slrpnk.net 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Not well, apparently.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I wonder how many of the ones they "solved" were just because they'd seen it discussed somewhere in the data set, considering the puzzles are apparently from a public resource.

[–] sudoreboot@slrpnk.net 8 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I don't know why anyone knowledgeable would expect them to be good at chess. LLMs don't generalise, reason or spot patterns, so unless they read a chess book where the problems came from...

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Likely close to 100%. If you read the (rather good) article, a little further down they test whether the LLM can play an extremely simplistic "Connect 4" game they devise, as a way of narrowing down on specifically reasoning capabilities.

It cannot.

Chess puzzles, in particular, are frequently shared and discussed in online chess spaces, so the LLM will have a significant amount of material to work with when it tries to predict the best response to give to the prompt.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 months ago

I didn't figure. I'm sure they could be taught to be much better, but normal computing can already play chess more or less perfectly. There really isn't much any room left to be gained.