this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
51 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2997 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I don’t have the energy to read through yet another battery article, so can I be lazy and ask: Does this actually matter or is this a fluff piece about a potential tech that is years away from market?

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I read it. It seems real and close to market. They have strategic investment from car companies and the battery charges quickly (5 minutes per 100 miles) while still retaining over 80% capacity after 2000 charges, which is apparently a typical regulation for EVs. Their goal is to get it down to 3 minutes per 100 miles of range so fast charging a car will be about like pumping gas and not a thing where you bring a Kindle or a Switch/SteamDeck to juice up.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 months ago

That is impressive, and sounds like it’s much more feasible than some of the stuff we’ve seen over the years.

[–] femtech@midwest.social 1 points 7 months ago

They will need the same batteries in the fast charger or a great AC to DC converter.in the cars.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Today’s research won’t impact you tomorrow, but research from a 5 to 10 years ago will impact you tomorrow. We’ve got to look at the bigger picture.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

While true, most of the time these articles come out, it’s talking about a theoretical improvement in a battery that isn’t likely feasible without a massive change in available materials, or their costs.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

And these early learnings compel others to do more research in the space, invest in the space, and eventually bring some stuff to market.

All of the tech that we use right now can be mapped back to research that uncovered knowledge with no immediate practical applications at the time.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Yes, fluff piece etc.