this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
683 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2667 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Lyft and Uber say they will leave Minneapolis if the mayor signs a minimum wage bill for drivers::Lyft and Uber threatened to stop doing business in Minneapolis after the city council adopted a new rule Thursday that would set a minimum wage for rideshare drivers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What assets? All they have is debt and maybe some servers. I guess the app and brand has some value, but only to another ride share company.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They have corporate employees beyond the drivers. They likely have offices and such.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago

They likely rent, so the most you are getting is a fee.

[–] SgtThunderC_nt@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If we're talking total fantasyland, I suppose put those employees to work building a government backed alternative or an open platform to allow smaller companies?

Suppose you had a centralized federated system where states or municipalities or even companies could have their own drivers but it's a common app?

Edit to add you could also have both driver and passenger rate each other and allow both to filter by rating, lower ratings would naturally pay more or less to compensate for the service. I bet in cities you'd have luxury versions of the same services all from the same app, but also cheap shitty services too.

[–] Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The existence of Uber and Lyft does not prevent the government from doing this. If we are paying people to build and maintain this process we may as well hire people to do so. Taking over Uber would lead to the best employees leaving for other tech companies.

[–] SgtThunderC_nt@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

I think you're underestimating how many people want to work for the government for the perceived benefits. I'm saying they have the stuff already set up, in fantasyland it would be a fairly smooth transition.