this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
161 points (90.0% liked)

Fediverse

28739 readers
266 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Maybe it is overlooked, but is that unexpected when it seems to cater to such a specific niche? I'm struggling to see why I would use it. If I want to play my own music, I can just use my local setup that uses better apps and has my playlists already. If I want discovery, I can use last.fm, YouTube Music, and other venues. If I want to share music with other people, I start to see a point, but would rather direct people to use Soulseek or a different self-hosted solution that allows downloads. Speaking of, why is there no download link on the files? The website is sharing copyrighted content either way, what difference does it make whether it's saved or streamed to my PC? At least with a download option I could see it as a Soulseek alternative.

And personally, it seems like a lot of effort to upload and reorganise my collection when I can't trust the server and my effort to still be there a few years down the line. After all, storage costs money and who knows when the server host will get bored, run out of spare cash, or get taken down for hosting licensed music. This is before we get into the fact that even the shitty opus re-encodes I keep are over 60gb (the instance I found only supports 50). Of course you'll tell me to host my own instance, but that is narrowing the niche once again as I would have to move my music to a server and learn how to host Funkwhale and would be opening myself up to legal problems.

Excuse my skepticism but I can only really see the use for either:

  • Music collectors that want to share music with each other but for some reason don't want to expand their library via downloading.
  • Users with a tiny or non-existent library that don't mind locking themselves into another website they don't control and can lose their data from at any moment.
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

the instance I found only supports 50

This was my issue with it. If you're uploading FLACs you use that up quickly.

Obviously giving everyone 100s of GiBs is a big ask for anyone hosting such a service, I understand that.

[–] rglullis -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] halm@leminal.space 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Registrations are closed on this pod.

Sure sounds swell.

[–] rglullis 1 points 8 months ago

Much like all other communick instances, registrations are done through the portal. After you register there, you can start your trial and login to it.

[–] rglullis -2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I described another case in the blog post: it would be really cool if indie labels or indie artists got together around their own instances, so that they could distribute/promote their own content with less restrictive licenses.

[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago

You're right, that's a very fair use case, and it would also boost the end-user appeal. I didn't address it as I was fully in a user mindset.

[–] xnx@slrpnk.net 4 points 8 months ago

But why would i post my music on a platform i can’t make money on and that has little to no discovery features? The site can barely be used without logging in and i haven’t seen any compatibility with mastodon to take advantage of activitypub and reaching new listeners