this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
135 points (92.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9666 readers
85 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] astraeus@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

They recognize exactly why people prefer larger vehicles and then completely miss why driving a smaller vehicle puts you at a disadvantage against those bigger vehicles. People would of course become very angry if they’re told their humongous, gas-guzzling, tank of a vehicle were illegal to operate on the road especially only 7 months into an 84 month loan.

How then to reasonably phase these giant cars out? They’re directly more dangerous to everyone but the person sitting inside.

[–] Magiccupcake@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago

The main thing is to remove the exemption of "light truck" for regulations that make suvs and trucks so much cheaper to manufacture for auto companies.

As for local areas, they can increase property taxes for heavy vehicles, to disentivse owning them.

[–] Dmian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Taxes. The trick to ban something without actually banning it is taxing it into oblivion, discouraging people from doing it. It won’t dissapear, but most people will be discouraged.

[–] the_medium_kahuna@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Regulations on the size of cars, ratcheting down for new models. Iirc, one of the factors in the increasing size of cars is due to how fuel efficiency standards are implemented - apparently it’s easier to make a car larger, but lighter, than to actually improve efficiency

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Increase their insurance premiums so that it actually account for the destruction those cars cause.

[–] buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago

Mass sabotage and vandalism

[–] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

We need to tax the externalities of antisocial behavior.

  1. Require safety standards to test the damage vehicles cause to pedestrians and cyclists, including women and children. Tax vehicles based on how dangerous they are to others on the road.
  2. Tax vehicles for the damage they do to the roads. Heavier vehicles destroy roads.