this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
657 points (95.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21226 readers
137 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    657
    And then you get hooked on it and start using it for real (sh.itjust.works)
    submitted 6 months ago by 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Boot off a live media every time you want to watch it

    [–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    They're clearly asking about performance not security

    [–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Performance wise every modern distro should be able to handle multiple video streams provided your pc has the resources.

    Probably would also be doable off the live media?

    [–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I imagine there'd be a performance penalty if using a flash drive for the OS. Not sure though.

    [–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 months ago

    Most important stuff is loaded in RAM, so unless you're downloading the stuff as well, you're probably fine

    [–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

    Only boot performance if you have enough RAM. Linux' pagecache can be quite agressive. I think with 4GB there won't be evicted pages, but with 8GB there won't for sure.

    [–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

    Yeah probably but it could be serviceable over USB C?

    [–] Schmuppes@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    What about a VM in Windows?

    [–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

    Honestly I know nothing about security, I just wanted to say a funny thing.

    I think a VM would work for most cases? There are ways for Malware to escape from VMs.

    Similar thing would probably be a consideration with a live media boot, as Malware could infect another OS on the machine.

    [–] mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Windows VM - even as hypervisor 1 - could leak any data. You need a revisited OS and kernel to be safe.

    Edit: Once you accessed your network your firmware could possibly track everything as well. But nobody knows. Once I heard that the intel firmware has more LoC then the linux kernel (which is the most collaborated human project ever in existence).

    [–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

    TAILS