this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
47 points (96.1% liked)

Canada

7206 readers
393 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Someone explain why having politicians on social media is a benefit in any way..

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Because gov't at any level should be using open platforms to communicate with citizens....

"Come join our roundtable discussion on.... Facebook"

Thats the opposite of transparency and open participation

[–] jadero@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago

Politicians are already on social media. What we need are government departments on social media. CRA and justice, at a bare minimum, should be on social media.

It also wouldn't hurt my feelings to have a "lemmy.gov.ca" instance with communities for parties, politicians, and every government department and ministry.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago

"The last thing I want is for our politicians and government agencies to be accessible to the public or, even worse, to be able to reach as many as are interested in hearing what they have to say!"

I'd far rather they be on the fediverse, preferably on their own instance(s), than on Facebook or Twitter.