this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
928 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
3376 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 37 points 6 months ago (3 children)

This is not going to stop bots.

[–] anarchaos@lemmy.ml 39 points 6 months ago (1 children)

here's hoping it stops site growth

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago

Most people don't get out of bed for a dollar so no, it won't outside the usual 10-30% pareto ratio, which is probably already getting impacted by Xitter being run into the ground.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

This will absolutely stop by far the most bots, because hostile governments like Russia and China use THOUSANDS of bots, having to pay $1 extra to maintain each bot, will be prohibitively expensive for those governments. Remember this can mean THOUSANDS in extra cost for those programs. No way either Russia or China will be able to afford that. So my guess is this will be 99.99% effective at preventing bots. The problem for Musk that he may not have foreseen is, the same will be true for MAGA racist anti LGBT propaganda bots. So now Twitter will go back to be dominated by liberals and socialists. Making it necessary for Musk to pay for another platform all over again, if he wants to have a free space to blurt his idiocy.

/s

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You had me in the first 1/4, NGL

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Yes I was joking, the real explanation is of course that most bots are made by underage kids that don't have access to credit cards, and can't afford $1 out of their allowance. 😋

[–] Tonguewaxer@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Isn't that the started intent? Like adding a small roadblock or captcha.

I'm not saying I agree but the simple logic should work. It'll likely reduce the user base and still let bits in with cash to burn.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In theory, maybe. In practice, the bots might just pay and post anyway. If they can recoup those costs in the scam, it costs them basically nothing.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

So bots pay to continue what they're doing, but Musky now gets money for it?

Ray Charles could see what's going on here.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago

This is what Craigslist did and now nobody uses it and we're forced to use the garbage platform that is Facebook Marketplace.