this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
885 points (90.3% liked)

Lefty Memes

4350 readers
751 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 64 points 7 months ago (4 children)

As much as I abhor the state and wish we live like the state of Cheran (ironic of me to say state in this case, I know), anarchy will only work in a very small group, where everyone knows each other, are like-minded enough to not abuse each other's goodwill, and respect each other's personal boundaries.

[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 7 months ago (5 children)
[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 7 months ago

Free trade and mutual cooperation between collectives, I thought this was considered the standard anarchic model?

[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Yes, our massive population and current way of life are not natural tendencies of our species, they are organizational forms put into place by rulers for more effecient exploitation.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And then what stops one small group from slowly becoming a giant group again?

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In other words, literally nothing.

[–] onoira@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 months ago

the same 'literally nothing' that currently stops us from ending starvation, poverty, homelessness, war…

people and ideology create the institutions which (re)produce and enforce a status quo. this is not inherently bad, and it would not be significantly different under any other 'system'. we are all the state so long as we do nothing different.

[–] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Like...? I really miss the point. Do you mean villages or genocide?

[–] businessfish@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

how could what they wrote mean genocide?

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's one way to ensure there's only a small group of people, same as suicide is the most reliable way to get rid of hiccups.

[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I didn't say a small group, i said lots of small groups

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's just lots of geno's for the cideing.

[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago

If you want to genocide them, thats on you

[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago

Definitely not genocide. Not sure if villages is the exact way to say it, but it's a lot closer lol

[–] DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So have a lot of small groups

Holy shit guys he solved the whole problem. Where should we send the check to?

[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 months ago

Obviously does not solve the whole problem. Imo, smaller, self-governing groups are better able to apply democratic policies, as there are not likely to be as many different ideas within the group.

As for the check, you can send it to my balls

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 4 points 7 months ago

I also wonder what happens as new generations start to become prominent, they might not have the same ideals as their parents and either move away or change the dynamics of the group.

[–] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's not my favorite. I don't really want to rely on people or be part of a close community like that. And I really like having personal property. I probably contribute the bare minimum to society outside of my taxes. Not part of any organizations, don't give to charity. Definitely don't give to the homeless. Don't volunteer. I just want to work and come home to my house with my family and all my stuff. I'd make a terrible anarchist.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 months ago

Why do you mention personal property? Anarchism and communism still allow ownership of personal property, but collective ownership of the means of production such as factories and schools. You could do everything you do now in a socialist or anarchist society.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What's the alternative that works?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

That's what we're all trying to figure out.