this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
36 points (90.9% liked)

Canada

7193 readers
656 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Canada has a monopoly problem. How did we get here? And how do we get out? Let’s bring home competition

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 34 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It started good, but then started to fall into typical conservative taking points.

He correctly identified that the problem started when Canada sold off crown corporations, but then attributed the problem to over regulation of these newly private cooperation.

Somehow he also called CBC a monopoly in there, which is a wild jump.

My main take away from this video is the best solution is to deregulate (the other points were "increase competition", but at this point that's like politians saying they will create more nurses or doctors, unless you also state a plan I assume you're just blowing smoke). His argument for how deregulating airlines or banking or ISPs would make things better for us didn't really exist.

Regulations might make it hard to start a new bank, so I'll give him that. But I have a hard time seeing how regulations is what's preventing new ISPs or grocery stores from cropping up.

Overall in my opinion it's a captivating video that lacks any substance, which is typical for politicans, but also disappointing because you don't often get to hear them talk about something for over 10 minutes where they actually do have time to explain a plan properly.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I particularly laughed at the line about an economy without competition no longer being capitalism. Like, no, this is just the natural progression of unfettered capitalism. If it's not capitalism what do they think it is? The line almost seemed like "anything I don't like is socialism/communism" dogwhistle.

If we want to actually drive competition, there are a few ways:

  1. State run alternatives.

You know what Canadian province had the most competitive telephone market? Saskatchewan. That's because they have a government run telecom (Sasktel) that doesn't operate on a for profit model.

  1. Antitrust laws with teeth.

Penalties for anti-competitive behaviour need to be big enough that they're not just a cost of doing business. If you get caught price fixing, the fine should be so high that you never, ever consider doing it again. Jail time for CEOs should be on the table for egregious enough situations.

  1. Abandon the "too big to fail" mentality.

When we prop up companies with shitty business practices, we're just encouraging them to fail even harder, because they know they'll always get bailed out.

[–] jadero@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

Anything too big to fail is also too big to care. If they don't care, why should we? Provide proper supports and retraining for everyone below the c-suite and let 'er rip.

[–] quilter@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago

On YouTube calling CBC a monopoly. What an ass.

[–] spencer@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If anything, the regulations that mandate that Rogers/Bell need to wholesale bandwidth on their networks helps startup ISPs. Gimme more of that.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Exactly. And a lot of that infrastructure was paid for by taxpayer money in the first place.

We could even go one step further and take it back. Nationalize the infrastructure layer, contract infrastructure maintenance back to the telcos, and lease the lines to whoever wants to use them to provide service.

We eventually had to switch away from a smaller ISP simply because they simply weren't allowed to offer the same level of service as Bell. The best they could offer was 25/10, whereas Bell was allowed to provide fiber to the home.