this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
372 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
5811 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The aircraft flew up to speeds of 1,200mph. DARPA did not reveal which aircraft won the dogfight.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Jets are a lot more expensive. What's at risk is all these resources for the jet going down the drain.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Huh? Jets are far more replaceable than a human operator who takes years of training and has "needs".

Ya know unless your military is running on cold war fumes or something and you can't afford to build an airframe you already have in production

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Training a combat pilot used to cost (in early 2000, not sure now) 10M€ for a NATO member.

Find me a modern jet that costs so little. Regardless of what politicians say, human life has a price… and it is waaaay below a jet (even including the training)

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but procurement of a combat pilot has about a two-decade lead time. You can build more jets a lot quicker (potentially even including the R&D phase).

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

Also as this war expands to become planet-wide, industrial output of drones will expand many orders of magnitude.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's not just money. It's time, public perception, quantity trainers, quantity student seats etc

A drone is ready the moment it comes off the assembly line, is flashed with software, and tested.

[–] everyone_said@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I'd imagine they'd evetually design a jet purpose built for an AI that would be a lot cheaper than a human-oriented one. Removing the need for a cockpit with seats, displays, controls, oxygen, etc would surely reduce cost. It would also open the door for innovations in air-frame design previously impossible.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 7 points 7 months ago

You mean like:

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

We keep talking like we’re discussing the future, but autonomous drones are already fighting in the skies of Ukraine.

Begun, the drone wars have.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Jets are in many ways expensive because they can't be expendible. They also make an bunch of compromises to accommodate keeping a human alive.

For the cost of a single f22, you could put up 60 Valkyries. I think I know which side I would bet on.