Sorry, should say I mean feature complete in a relative sense. Ie, some EA games are essentially tech demos, and you're funding a theoretical game when you buy. If those games stopped getting updates, you're left with a mostly empty unreal engine project, not a full video game.

Valheim was a full video game on day one. A buddy and I played many hours when it first came out and thoroughly enjoyed it. If no updates came out, I might have felt like there was some unmet potential, but I certainly wouldn't have been insulted. Bottom line, take away the roadmap, I still see a great game with enough going for it to stand on its own.

[–] brenticus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

What is the current state of the Early Access version?

“Most planned core features of the game have been implemented. Single-player and multiplayer modes are fully functional and we have a separate dedicated server tool if you want a server running 24/7. There are currently six fully developed biomes out of a planned total of eight (plus the Ocean). There are hundreds of different items (weapons, materials, armor etc) in the game, to be found or crafted by the player. We have over 200 building pieces, and about 50 different types of creatures including monsters, animals and bosses.”

It sounds like the game's getting Ashlands plus one more biome, but not much for new features. So depending on your definition of feature complete it's at least pretty close anyways. From this point on it's theoretically more of the same.

I'm pretty much on the same page as you, although I started playing a couple months ago with a couple friends. The game is obviously not abandoned, and it's a pretty full game even with more to come. We finally built a hot tub on the weekend and I don't know how I'm supposed to expect more from this game than chilling in a tub with your naked viking bros.