this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
51 points (94.7% liked)

PC Gaming

8551 readers
351 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Totally fine with me, I just want more vram, way more vram

[–] drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Same. Get me a card with an older chip that has 32/64 gigs of just-decent VRAM but they won't do it!

[–] AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

128gb of gddr5! Lol

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Who needs texture compression or advanced streaming techniques when you can just have all 200GB of data in memory at once?

[–] AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

For gaming, the improvement in cores matters much more than the memory bandwidth, and for machine learning, more memory is needed desperately, so a new core with more vram, even if it's not the latest hot shit vram, I would be totally happy with.