this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
129 points (97.8% liked)

Selfhosted

40183 readers
1070 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I am driving away from nextcloud more and more. I would be back when they get rid of php and really develop even one plugin (the so called "apps") which isn't just an alpha version.

I don't see any use case for this bloated all in one monster with crap performance. Someone needs his files in a browser and overall synced. Use syncthing and something like filebrowser or filestash. Photos? Immich. Documents? Paperless. Music, Movies, e-books? Jellyfin. Collaborative Docs? Onlyoffice, cryptpad. Notes? Joplin, trillium. etc.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Bloat and bad performance aside, you don't see a benefit in having a all-in-one solution that in a way acts as a drop in replacement for people wanting to switch away from the likes of Google/Apple? I certainly do.

Yes, having a dedicated app selected for each use case will likely give better results. But it also means more management. And many users don't actually need more than basic functionality.

But yes looking at the complaints, they should look at polishing existing features first.

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I know about the successful help being an alternative to apple/google. When I start degoogling (5 years ago) nextcloud was impressive. But I talk about my own experience. And nextcloud doesn't work on their basics. Instead they're following every hype with an alpha app which doesn't get support when the hype ends (nextcloud social) for example.

Maybe they could fork owncloud again? Owncloud worked over years to get rid of php and released last year "infinity scale" its a single binary. You can run it nearly out of the box. And it is stable and fast. Nextcloud needs this, too.

The php part is something a newbie wouldn't easy success with. The alternatives I recommend are all easy to install docker containers, which are simple to maintain and no worries about the next release could break everything.

A newbie should be running AIO in docker, which in my experience, has been pretty solid.

[–] PeachMan@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yuuuup. I really don't understand why it's so popular. It's bloated and overly complex. I've tried running an instance twice in the past few years, and both times I gave up within a week.

[–] cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 months ago

It did took me a week ,but I'm running one for 4years on a raspberry pi 4, it works good enough to share files and sync contacts and calendar.

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

It's popular because people want this to be real, but it's just a promise. The actual thing can't run without crapping it's pants. Even if you manage to run it fine, there will be an update that will break everything.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Blames PHP for all the issues