Technology

59446 readers

3620 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

118

What a TikTok Ban Would Mean for the U.S. Defense of an Open Internet (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 6 months ago by lautan@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

51 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Global digital rights advocates are watching to see if Congress acts, worried that other countries could follow suit with app bans of their own.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

From the UK perspective broadcasters have a license to broadcast and are regulated by ofcomm. I thought the FCC had similar oversight of the US broadcasters - for example not being keen on swearing and sex on TV. For UK news programmes there is a requirement to be balanced for example.

[–] isles@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Most assuredly, the licensing of the spectrum comes with requirements and strings, so those broadcasters are regulated. They must follow the rules or risk their license.

However, radio licensing came about to avoid broadcast "collisions" for amateur radio operators in ~1912. Regulations came later under the FCC in 1934.

These same collisions are not applicable to the internet (or rather, we've already used methods to avoid them, like DNS).