this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
58 points (91.4% liked)

Selfhosted

39964 readers
363 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
58
Cheap, but reliable SSDs? (feddit.de)
submitted 6 months ago by agressivelyPassive@feddit.de to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I want to upgrade some of my older machines with some new, high(er) capacity SSDs (SATA and nvme). I don't need super high speeds, just something in the TB range in terms of storage.

Problem is, there's so much garbage out there, I can't really tell, which SSD is inexpensive and reliable and which is just utter garbage.

I thought about buying new, but last gen Samsung/WD SSDs.

Intenso and Fanxiang both seem to have been around for a few years, but reviews seem to be mixed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Price to published write endurance might get you started, but I’m curious what answers you get because this is a difficult question IMHO. Actual reliability depends heavily on firmware which is a vendor-specific secret sauce.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's absolutely opaque to me, especially the non-big-name brands barely get any reliable reviews and especially given the silicon lottery, I can't tell if every chip is like the reviewed ones.

If I just happen to get the bad module that craps out after 6 months, the positive reviews are not that helpful.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If I just happen to get the bad module that craps out after 6 months, the positive reviews are not that helpful.

That's what RAID(5) is for, if a drive craps out you just shrug and get a new one (or warranty), no data loss. Easy enough to cobble together with a PCIe card and 4ish smaller drives, faster too...

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well, except when a second drive dies 36 hours later and suddenly you are panicking..

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 months ago

Yep, as can happen easily if you buy in a batch. Just like ransom (related, no?), non-sequential serial numbers please.