Technology

60131 readers

2755 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

380

Court upholds New York law that says ISPs must offer $15 broadband (arstechnica.com)

submitted 8 months ago by inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Trade groups claimed the state law is preempted by former Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai's repeal of net neutrality rules. Pai's repeal placed ISPs under the more forgiving Title I regulatory framework instead of the common-carrier framework in Title II of the Communications Act. 2nd Circuit judges did not find this argument convincing:

Second, the ABA is not conflict-preempted by the Federal Communications Commission's 2018 order classifying broadband as an information service. That order stripped the agency of its authority to regulate the rates charged for broadband Internet, and a federal agency cannot exclude states from regulating in an area where the agency itself lacks regulatory authority. Accordingly, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and VACATE the permanent injunction.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

OK thanks, as a bottom level cheap option, that's not too bad. It's not great, but it should be enough for essential tasks.
I'm assuming it's unlimited traffic without throttling. Because otherwise it wouldn't really be broadband 24/7 as I expect is required.
Otherwise it's still useless.

[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

While looking for that I also found something saying the FCC wants to raise the requirements of it it 100 but the last vote didn't go through

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wow, that would be pretty great, unless there's a data cap, which makes it useless.

[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Caps are allowed but the FCC has shown interest in regulating it. Maybe some decade.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

With caps it's completely worthless. It's not broadband if it's throttled below it.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 months ago

I think 100 is unreasonable, especially if it's a minimum agreed level of service. Peak usage would absolutely suffer and be hard to maintain at that level.

I think the should raise it to 25/10 though. 3mbps up sucks for things like video calls. 5 is probably enough, but 3 is just too low.

I personally have 50/25 ($55/month total), and it's plenty fast for everything I've needed. I plan to upgrade soon when I get on my city's new fiber network, but I'm unwilling to pay for anything much faster right now.