this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
1482 points (98.7% liked)

Work Reform

10028 readers
231 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 175 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Doing your job at a high standard is a problem? Who makes this garbage up?

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 61 points 6 months ago

It's companies gaslighting us that we are either looking for new roles, or we are working hard to make more money/ask for a raise or else we'll find a new role.

Managers see both these things as "not being part of the fam", but really they just want to take more and give less while playing the victim.

[–] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Yeah I always thought ‘quiet quitters’ referred to people checking out of their jobs emotionally and doing just barely enough to not get fired, so actually underperforming, not because they couldn’t do better but because they stopped caring at some point. In that sense they have already quit, quietly. But now it seems that anyone who doesn’t go above and beyond can be a ‘quiet quitter’? Doesn’t make much sense to me.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

Nah, quit quitting is just the new term for it. Boomers called it working to the letter of your contract. Quit quitting isn’t doing less than your job duties. It’s simply refusing to bend over backwards and give your employer all of your free time. You don’t take on extra responsibility. You don’t come in early or stay late. You come in on time, do your exact job duties as written, then you go home.

But this terrifies employers, who have historically relied on manipulation and coercion to get employees to work beyond the scope of what they were hired for. So they’ve started calling it “quit quitting” in an effort to rebrand it as something negative.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 months ago

They're just toeing the line for their corporate masters. Capitalists want 150% effort for 100% pay since the profit margin on that extra 50% alone is huge.

[–] stinerman@midwest.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I've known people who are the best workers on their team, but put in like 40% effort. Does that count as quiet quitting? IDK.

To be clear, I'm not excusing the article, which is a bad joke. That being said, there are plenty of people out there that are really good at their jobs, but don't put in full effort. I don't have a problem with these people at all (really who does 100% effort all of the time?).

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

really who does 100% effort all of the time?

Idiots

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

They don't just want your work output; they want your soul.

They want the old days where people were 100% believers in their jobs at places like WeWork, Uber, Tesla, and Facebook...before the general public became disillusioned with tech companies specifically and companies in general more broadly. They want "evangelists" and the belief of the mid-Obama years back...

The only problem is that many have looked at things over the last ten years and found that the euphoric promises made by the management of companies were lies.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Because people cannot like you and you still feel obligated to earn your paycheck and you have honor. Unlike the dip shits you are quitting from because they are drunken assholes that can't see past their whiney little emergencies.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think it is meant as satire

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Neither the site nor the author point to any of this being satire, unfortunately.

They’re just that much detached from reality.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

You are right, I assummed it was like the onion, but appears the irishtimes business section plays to the businesses it attracts ( of shitty companies avoiding taxes in their own country)