this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
474 points (96.1% liked)

linuxmemes

21226 readers
73 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    474
    I don't know who Wayland is (i.imgflip.com)
    submitted 6 months ago by Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    137 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    If anyone wants to give an ELI5 or a link to a video that ELI5 I'd be incredibly thankful

    I swear that all the stuff I find is like super in depth technical stuff that just loses me in no time flat

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    The Wayland protocol board can never agree on anything. It takes them years to decide to consider adding something.

    Also Wayland is just a protocol at the end of the day so implementation is up to the software developers. I also think that the Unix philosophy holds back software that could be good. You shouldn't prioritize it over good battery life and low overhead.

    [–] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

    I also think that the Unix philosophy holds back software that could be good.

    IMO the UNIX philosophy is the reason why Linux survived. Imagine if every distro had a single DE, or you had issues with pulseaudio and couldn't replace it with pipewire.

    You shouldn’t prioritize it over good battery life and low overhead.

    And why would separating functionality into different tools cause you to have a worse battery life? You don't get to have tlp on other OS because it's all integrated