this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
718 points (99.0% liked)

xkcd

8841 readers
10 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://xkcd.com/2933

Alt text:

==COSMOLOGY==> 'Uhhh ... how sure are we that everything is made of these?'

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Crazy thing is very similar mathematical structures is used to define the behavior of a single particle in QFT and of a huge collection of particles in condensed matter physics

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (7 children)

It’s not crazy when you think they are both trying to model the same universe.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

When you section off a small part of the universe and try to model it, there's little reason your model should look like a model for a completely different small part of the universe. Not unless they share fundamental characteristics that you're trying to model. The math that describes permanent deformation looks nothing like fluid dynamics.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Recursive universe theory strikes again.

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They are both describing the same particles.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 6 months ago

I mean in the case of the comic, yeah the reason for the behavior actually is tied to pretty much the same principles, but the generalized statement you made isn't, well, generalizable.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They are both describing the same particles.

Water and ice are made up the same particles and molecules yet the mathematical structure to define the effect of force/pressure is very different - plastic deformation vs fluid dynamics as the example given above

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)