this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
25 points (80.5% liked)

movies

1765 readers
183 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

People have been looking at Demi Moore’s body for more than 40 years. On the cover of Vanity Fair in 1991, nude and seven months pregnant. Rippling with muscles in GI Jane. Under strip club spotlights in Striptease. In her new horror film The Substance – which has become the most talked-about premiere at the Cannes Film Festival – we see her body again. Then again and again. But it’s gnarlier this time. A younger woman hatches out of Moore’s back, leaving behind two macabre flaps of flesh on either side of her spine. Over the course of the film, Moore ages and rots, every crease of her skin filmed with gooey sadism. It may be her shock ticket to an Oscar.

...

The film, from the French director Coralie Fargeat, has proven divisive already, with some critics calling it “an audacious masterpiece”, and others calling it tired hagsploitation with little to actually say about women, age or Hollywood. Regardless, Moore is earning the best reviews of her career. “Moore has never really taken a risk of this nature before,” wrote IndieWire’s David Ehrlich. “The places that risk takes her in the movie’s absolutely bonkers final act will have your jaw on the floor, if it’s even still attached to your body.” “Ripping into her best big-screen role in decades, Moore is fearless,” raved the BBC. “Extraordinary,” added The Telegraph, with Variety remarking that Moore’s performance “is rippled with anger, terror, despair, and vengeance”. There have been suggestions she could surprise-win the Best Actress prize at Cannes, which would then thrust her straight to the top of prediction lists for next year’s Oscars.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

“Person in movie could win award for being in movie”

how tf is this news

[–] Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I would say the news is in the idea that she may win a huge award for a gross role, and it being undeniably a horror movie makes it more newsworthy.

Horror has been the red-headed step-child of film for quite some time. In spite of it being one of the biggest money making genres.

So, huge successful actor who has never done horror before, bringing more attention to the genre on a different level.

This is more newsworthy than X is now banging Y.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago

Also:

Regardless, Moore is earning the best reviews of her career.

So... Actress gets best reviews of her long career, may be up for awards.