this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
133 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
2850 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I often see a lot of people with outdated understanding of modern LLMs.

This is probably the best interpretability research to date, by the leading interpretability research team.

It's worth a read if you want a peek behind the curtain on modern models.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

There is no mind. It's pretty clear that these people don't understand their own models. Pretending that there's a mind and the other absurd anthropomorphisms doesn't inspire any confidence. Claude is not a person jfc.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 7 points 5 months ago

You’re reading the title too literally. “Mind” is only mentioned once in the entire article, and that’s in the title.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ah yes, it must be the scientists specializing in machine learning studying the model full time who don't understand it.