It's especially interesting that they laid off a lot of people who were the only ones in their particular job, leaving entire jobs uncovered. I suspect this comes right before shutting them entirely or doing it all "with AI" 🤮.

Sad in particular about Alice Bell. She was fantastic, and it always felt like she kept the site going through all the shit of recent years. Plus being the driving force behind their podcast (the Electronic Wireless Show) of course also spells doom for that one though I hope that like Indiescovery they go rogue and run it independent of the site.

Bleak times. Fuck IGN.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I disagree. Ads are not the answer. Treating them as such is simply giving up.

[–] Goronmon@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Agreed, ads are not the answer. Paying for content is the answer.

But people want their content to be free, while also being angry that their free content contains ads.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Bro $4,000 OLED TVs are riddled with rows of home screen ads. What are you talking about that paid content has no ads? ALL CONTENT HAS FUCKING ADS. This has gotten absurd. Fuck ads.

[–] Goronmon@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What are you talking about that paid content has no ads?

The article that OP posted is on a site that allows you to pay and from what I can tell doesn't have any obvious ads that I've seen.

But at the end of the day, find a site you like, pay for the content if you can and run an ad-blocker.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not responding to OP. I'm responding to you.

[–] Goronmon@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

OK? I was giving you an example of "paid content with no ads" that you claimed didn't exist. What is confusing you?

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Man.....you said the issue with all of this is people not willing to pay to remove ads. I'm saying that even when you buy expensive products, you still have ads. So ads are everywhere, regardless of whether you pay or use free products. The entire business model is fucked. That's what I'm saying. I'm not sure what it causing the confusion here.

[–] Goronmon@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Ahh...I see where you got confused.

I was saying that people will run an ad-blocker, but also refuse to pay directly for content.

And then complain that nobody makes good content.

I’m saying that even when you buy expensive products, you still have ads.

Sure, but that's not really related to the topic. "Why are there ads in the products I pay for?" is a different issue than "Why are there ads in the products I don't pay for?

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yea. Separate but related issues I suppose. I just feel like even when we pay tons of money for expensive products, we will get ads. Even modern cars are collecting an obscene amount of data even though we pay a shit ton of money for them. It's completely out of control.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because content distributors haven't thought of another way to get money. The only other thing they came up with is subscriptions. Some have thought of donations, but they haven't banded together to come up with an alternative. It's weak and totally mid.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Literally what other options are there?

[–] dat_fast_boi@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Outside of straight cash and ads, off the top of my head a user could give a website data, content, or computing power. Which, as I kept writing this, I've found aren't perfect alternatives.

Personal data collection seems compelling, since the data can be sold to hungry data brokers looking to optimise their ads, but tech-savvy users want to keep their data safe, either by using plugins to block ads and tracking, or by not using your website. And you'd also have to have no soul to do this.

User generated content gives users a reason to engage and return, and it also means you could save money that you'd have otherwise used to pay someone to make content. If you rely on this too much though, ethical concerns become apparent - last I checked, Reddit mods are unpaid.

Volunteer computing could maybe lower costs by offloading some server calculations onto volunteer's computers when idle, but I don't know if it could even be used for that. It's probably a non-starter for websites, too; to a user it would seem like your site was asking them to install a crypto miner.

... this comment is getting too long and doesn't really have a point. But I can't let the 45 minutes I spent writing it go to waste so easily. Hm... what if I combined all 3 ideas?

Yes, a website that asks you to volunteer idle computer time to train an algorithm that can both be outsourced to other companies and used to analyse your personal data, which itself can be given to other companies and used to reccomend you posts you are more likely to comment on, adding value to the website! Surely this has none of the flaws that I described before.