this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
257 points (98.5% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3693 readers
944 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry or fascism. This is a Star Trek community. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable, neither is supporting people who actively want to kill those groups. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I couldn't find a higher resolution image of is this, sorry.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

During the first season of Star Trek The Next Generation, there was never a full-time chief engineering officer for the Enterprise-D. Originally the producers thought that most of the action would take place on the bridge and would rarely go to other areas of the ship, including engineering. The bridge officers would call over the intercom to the other areas and have some voice actor say "Yes sir!" and so forth to save money on new sets. Gene Roddenberry disagreed with this idea and had a change made to the shooting script for the pilot episode "Encounter at Farpoint" to include a scene in engineering; otherwise no engineering set would have been built at all. That set the stage to bring in a new character to act as the chief engineer. Well, it didn't quite work out as planned at first.

https://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/chief_engineers_tng.htm

Now I don't know where they got that from, but that website is generally a reliable source. But I was wrong, it wasn't Gene.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So why would I blame Roddenberry if Roddenberry is the reason the Engineering set got built?

Your previous comment made it sound like he was against the idea of going to Engineering.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My edit must not have gone through. I forgot to add that I was wrong and it wasn't Roddenberry and edited my comment, but it didn't go through to you fast enough I guess. Sorry.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Okay. The idea that they didn't want to film in Engineering really confused me. Because Encounter At Farpoint made a big show of Picard walking the entire set from top to bottom.

It makes a lot of sense that Roddenberry himself vetoed that idea.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I had always heard it was Roddenberry that said no Engineering set, but this does make more sense.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe Roddenberry's PoS lawyer...

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm guessing Paramount producers in this case, but it's hard to know. It seems to me that Maizlish was more about just doing things his way rather than saving the studio money.

And in the end, they just redressed one of the movie sets as Enterprise-D Engineering and saved money anyway.