this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
52 points (98.1% liked)

PC Gaming

8581 readers
508 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] towerful@programming.dev 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's sad. Also, not really surprising. KSP2 has had a very rough development cycle, and a very rough release.
Do they still support KSP?

[โ€“] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 months ago

Doubtful. But that might actually be a good thing.

KSP is feature complete and has a massive modding community. I remember back in the old days when modders had to worry about every new update breaking their mods.

Players would have to wait for their mods to catch up before updating the game. And each new update usually required a new save.

The cowboy days of KSP.

Nowadays not having to worry about mods breaking is a huge relief.