this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
1824 points (96.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21192 readers
554 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world -5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    You sound like some guy screaming everyone should own a horse after the car became popular.

    [–] lord_admiral@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    No, what I'm screaming about is that every car owner should visit an airport at least once in their life.

    [–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    That doesn't make sense, your advocating the opposite, you want people to work on 25 year old tech. For "reasons".

    [–] lord_admiral@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

    On the contrary, I am in favor of banning computers altogether.

    [–] HStone32@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

    I think that analogy oversimplifies according to the assumption that one is inherently better than the other. OP's point here is that it isn't all better at all.

    I think a more accurate analogy would be that the OP is screaming that horse trails, ranches, and farms are being shut down because they don't accommodate cars.