this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
676 points (94.5% liked)

News

23301 readers
3751 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Relying on that is a dogshit strategy that disenfranchises voters, loses elections, and gives republicans a majority

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Again, it's not a choice to rely on that. It's the physics of the system. There is no other practical way to contest an election in the United States. It's a first-past-the-post electoral system.

There. Are. Two. Candidates.

Only two. You pick from those two. One of them will likely be closer to your ideals, the other will be farther away from your ideals. Pick one. Which one do you pick? The one closer to your ideals, or the one farther away?

Or will you decide not to vote at all and just let everyone else pick for you? How is that a better strategy? You still get one of those two candidates.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Enjoy your republican majority and good luck with the coup.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm not American, I'm writing all this as an external observer.

What alternative do you propose to voting Democrat?

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Support local grassroots pro-working class political movements and candidates instead of voting for the least worse ghoul every 4 years? Find the local chapter of whatever you think is better? Get involved for a cause that both parties are actively harming ? Demand, by any means available, elected officials to not be pieces of shit if they want your vote? Maybe just stop defending genocide support on the internet because it makes our guy look bad.

Putting your vote behind someone you believe to be detrimental to your own values should not be the default position and is, at best, the worst case scenario. Screw the two US parties and everything they stand for.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Did you watch that CPG Grey video I linked to earlier? Voting third party is the same as not voting under the American electoral system. It's basic game theory. So your alternative to voting Democrat boils down to "do nothing."

[–] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

cgpgreys video does not say it's the same as not voting

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, he says it's worse than not voting because it's soaking up votes that in absence of the third party would have gone to the "least worse" of the two actually viable parties. I was being generous and assuming OP wasn't going to vote for that party anyway.

[–] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

his charcterization isn't scientific fact. it is opinion.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

It is fact, actually. This is a result of basic game theory. First-past-the-post electoral systems inexorably develop into two-party systems because of the mechanism that he describes, in the same way that gas inexorably diffuses or water flows downhill.

Insisting that it won't happen because you feel like it shouldn't happen just causes you to fall into the traps CPG Grey described.

[–] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Insisting that it won’t happen because you feel like it shouldn’t happen

that didn't happen here.

[–] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

game theory assumes that we have rational actors acting in their own best interests. That's not what people do. game theory doesn't predict what people will do.

[–] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

First-past-the-post electoral systems inexorably develop into two-party systems because of the mechanism that he describes

this is the crux of duverger's "law" which is not a law at all but actually a tautology.

[–] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

the same way that gas inexorably diffuses or water flows downhill.

no, those can be calculated and predicted. the same isn't true for the rate at which political parties are created or dissolved.