this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
54 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37725 readers
744 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a former wallpaper factory in Chiswick, west London, a start-up firm has been developing a long-term storage system that uses lasers to burn tiny holograms into a light-sensitive polymer.

Chief executive Charlie Gale points out that with magnetic tape, data can only be stored on the surface, whereas holograms can store data in multiple layers.

"You can do things called multiplexing, whereby you can layer multiple sets of information in one space. That's really kind of the superpower of what we're doing. And we believe we can put more information in less space than ever before," he says.

HoloMem's polymer blocks can handle extreme temperatures, without the data becoming corrupted - between -14C to 160C.

By comparison, magnetic tape needs to be kept between 16C and 25C, which means significant heating and cooling costs, particularly in countries with extreme temperatures.

Tape also needs replacing after around 15 years, whereas the polymer is good for at least 50 years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I can't wait to see what a crystal hologram reader is gonna cost. :-p

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

$7.99 a session and she will tell you the winning lottery numbers too

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Forget the lottery numbers, I wanna know when I'll get laid.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 8 points 5 months ago

You should probably just take the lotto numbers

load more comments (3 replies)