this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
206 points (95.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5237 readers
490 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
206
Farmers who graze sheep under solar panels say it improves productivity. So why don’t we do it more? (grist.org)
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Longpork3@lemmy.nz 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We have billions of captive animals that will be forcibly impregnated every year in order to replace those thag are killed, and even under the most "humane" conditions will still be killed at a fraction of their natural lifespan, yet you consider cutting out the forced impregnation part in order to end the cycle of violence to be "genocide"?

You don't think that label might be more appropriately applied to the systematic killing of billions every yeat which will happen in perpetuity until we end animal agriculture?

[–] CottonSeed@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

the goal isn't to wipe them out. it's not genocide

[–] seeking_perhaps@mander.xyz 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're right, it is much worse. The goal is to breed them as quickly as possible, use them for their wool while they are useful for it, and kill them much younger than their lifespan for their meat. I think it would be a kindess to slowly stop that torturous cycle.

[–] CottonSeed@slrpnk.net -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

you can't kill something before its lifespan. when it dies, that is the end of its lifespan.