this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
276 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

59575 readers
3696 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
276
Why we don't have 128-bit CPUs (www.xda-developers.com)
submitted 5 months ago by jwr1@kbin.earth to c/technology@lemmy.world
131 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Why are we not using them in end-user devices

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

We are.

Addressing-wise, no we don't have consumer level 128bit CPUs and probably won't ever need them.

Instructions though, SSE had some 128bit ops (OR/XOR, MOVE) and AVX is 128bit vector math. AVX2 is 256bit vector math, AVX512 is- you guessed it 512bit vector math. AltiVec on PPC had 128bit vectors 20 years ago.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

There's no benefit.