this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
620 points (98.7% liked)
Astronomy
6883 readers
33 users here now
A community for sharing astronomy-related news, content, research, photographs, etc.
When sharing photographs and articles, please make an effort to include source URLs.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments


Knowing what I know, I am assuming this image was standardised and then normalised (fancy stats algos to keep things in the same visual range) while stitching it together, and the final product enhanced a lot of colouration (saturation). They're subtle or undetectable to the naked eye, but they exist. They are reflected in the different minerals present. I've done this stuff (raster stitching) with different imagery. Op was active in the comments with info, but I didn't read up on it.
Pasted from the Reddit thread:
Excellent explanation. Appreciate you sharing it!
here's what I'd like to know: would we perceive any of this pigmentation from the lunar surface?
Pasted from the Reddit thread:
Those are great explanations!
Yeah when you get into "proper" photography you quickly realize a "real" image is somewhat subjective. This moon is cracked to 1000%, though.
It's true. I did photography as a hobby as a kid and it set me ahead when I started mapping. It's all the same no matter the domain.