this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
494 points (95.7% liked)

News

23259 readers
3164 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange returned to his homeland Australia aboard a charter jet on Wednesday, hours after pleading guilty to obtaining and publishing U.S. military secrets in a deal with Justice Department prosecutors that concludes a drawn-out legal saga.

The criminal case of international intrigue, which had played out for years, came to a surprise end in a most unusual setting with Assange, 52, entering his plea in a U.S. district court in Saipan, the capital of the Northern Mariana Islands. The American commonwealth in the Pacific is relatively close to Assange’s native Australia and accommodated his desire to avoid entering the continental United States.

Assange was accused of receiving and publishing hundreds of thousands of war logs and diplomatic cables that included details of U.S. military wrongdoing in Iraq and Afghanistan. His activities drew an outpouring of support from press freedom advocates, who heralded his role in bringing to light military conduct that might otherwise have been concealed from view and warned of a chilling effect on journalists. Among the files published by WikiLeaks was a video of a 2007 Apache helicopter attack by American forces in Baghdad that killed 11 people, including two Reuters journalists.

Assange raised his right fist as he emerged for the plane and his supporters at the Canberra airport cheered from a distance. Dressed in the same suit and tie he wore during his earlier court appearance, he embraced his wife Stella Assange and father John Shipton who were waiting on the tarmac.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Senseless@feddit.org 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I probably should know better than to argue with a random stranger on the Internet but I'll bite.. Why do you think he got off easy if he spend 7 years in the Ecuadorian embassy and 5 years in an UK prison, when his sentence is 5 years?

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

According to the Espionage Act of 1917, he could be sentenced to life imprisonment or executed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espionage

[–] tastysnacks@programming.dev 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The US justice system is rarely that strict. For example, Donlad Trump could get sentenced to decades in prison, but likely won't spend anytime in jail.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Incarceration is the most extreme sentencing for nonviolent class E felonies without a prior record. The standard sentencing is a fine, community service, and/or probation.

The standard sentencing for espionage begins with incarceration. It’s just a question of how long, or if they’re deserving of execution.

[–] tastysnacks@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

if they could make espionage stick. The New York times didn't get prosecuted for publishing the Pentagon papers.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I know that's the norm but you'd think that even with it being the first time he was caught, the 30 count would warrant a more serious response. What would they do if he did this 30 times with a trial between each commitment of a felony? I think that should be a deciding factor even if it's not likely to be.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It’s thirty counts, but it’s still considered his first offense. They’re not considered consecutive. The only way he’ll see prison for that crime is if he proves to be at risk of committing more crime without “rehabilitative incarceration.” If Merchan reaches too far on his sentencing, it’ll just fuel the bias claim in Trump’s inevitable appeal.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I probably have the jargon wrong as I'm no lawyer. But I would still think the count severity should matter more than it does.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Me neither. I’m just repeating what attorneys and judges have publicly said on the matter. We’ll see when the time comes.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

The point of this thread. He indeed got off easy.