this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
253 points (98.8% liked)

Linux Gaming

15243 readers
95 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi there, I'm posting here because it's more underground compared to Reddit (since I think that the dev wouldn't like it to get mainstream attention).

There is an open-source WC3 engine called Warsmash (made using LibGDX): https://github.com/Retera/WarsmashModEngine

( Discord server: https://discord.com/invite/ucjftZ7x7H )

I thought I might share it here, if anyone is interested in participating in its development. There isn't a Flatpak version yet and it also misses some features e.g.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I believe you just underestimated these general instances of Lemmy. Also it doesn’t sound like you got the approval of the dev to post this. Doesn’t feel completely right, I dunno.

The developer is hosting the entire thing literally on Microsoft servers and Microsoft is currently acquiring Blizzard. "I don't want the owner to know this, that's why I rent a room in his office and have the doors wide open all the time and put up signs right there of what I'm doing."

On one hand the developer is smart enough to write a game engine but then claims to not understand the very basics of open source software hosted on Github?

[–] 520@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Microsoft =/= Activision. MS are generally FAR better in how they treat fan projects.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Microsoft =/= Activision.

Not yet. Only the UK left to be ~~bribed~~ convinced to approve that huge takeover by convicted monopolist Microsoft.

[–] 520@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even then, Microsoft have a very different management approach to Activision. Although they are typically fairly hands off when it comes to purchased subsidiaries, they are probably going to draw some exceptions to behaviours that hurt MS overall, something Activision's typical management would be very guilty of.

[–] Bilu47@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I assumed that he didn't want it to get too much attention (because Bellular once covered it & the joke the dev made went wrong. It was taken seriously). I don't know what his real stance is towards this topic.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the joke the dev made went wrong. It was taken seriously

Is that "legal stuff" a joke as well?

[–] Bilu47@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't think so, but it sounded like he isn't sure about the correct legal license because he said once that he may need to change the license to GPL. If you wanna, you can join the Discord server (he is pretty active there) and talk with him about the proper licensing of his project.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

talk with him about the proper licensing of his project.

No because luckily open source licensing does not care if a maintainer is too lazy to read a few lines of MIT License. I'm not a native speaker and I understand the MIT License just fine.