this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
503 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2521 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal appeals court has agreed to halt the reinstatement of net neutrality rules until August 5th, while the court considers whether more permanent action is justified.

It’s the latest setback in a long back and forth on net neutrality — the principle that internet service providers (ISPs) should not be able to block or throttle internet traffic in a discriminatory manner.

The current FCC, which has three Democratic and two Republican commissioners, voted in April to bring back net neutrality. The 3–2 vote was divided along party lines.

Broadband providers have since challenged the FCC’s action, which is potentially more vulnerable after the Supreme Court’s recent decision to strike down Chevron deference — a legal doctrine that instructed courts to defer to an agency’s expert decisions except in a very narrow range of circumstances.

Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Matt Schettenhelm said in a report prior to the court’s ruling that he doesn’t expect the FCC to prevail in court, in large part due to the demise of Chevron.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The day that Chevron was struck down, a bunch of people here on Lemmy told me it was a good idea to leave these things up to the courts from now on.

And now here we are.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Those people are fucking morons.

What the fuck does a judge, especially a supreme court judge who doesn't need to have ANY experience, know about literally anything?

This shit is absolutely criminal... As it stands now my monopoly ISP REMOVED the 300mbps service and forced me into a 500mbps without my knowledge and increased the price by $40

Absolutely fucking criminal... All they are doing is throttling speed to give you that 300 so why the fuck can't it still exist? Oh yeah... Money. They want more money. It's so fucking gross...

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

The funny thing was that SCOTUS decided that Trump could commit any crimes he wanted if they were an "official presidential act" a few days later. I wish I could remember the usernames of the people who were arguing that with me so I could have asked them what they thought about Chevron after that happened. And now this.