this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39281 readers
226 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
1
Wireguard over TCP (linuxserver docker) (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by elghoto@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hi,

I would like to use Wireguard over TCP. I'm trying to reach my server from a restrictive network and UDP is being blocked. TCP is not blocked in certain ports though, and I would like to open a VPN server that listen on those over TCP.

I'm using the wireguard Linuxserver docker image. Any suggestions?

Thanks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] exu@feditown.com 1 points 1 year ago

Wireguard only supports UDP. The main reason being TCP over TCP is extremely slow.

You could try OpenVPN, I think that has a TCP mode though, as said, don't expect good performance.