this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
230 points (96.7% liked)

science

14726 readers
866 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
m3t00@lemmy.world
laverabe@lemmy.world
DeadPand@midwest.social
Joleee@lemmy.world
230
AI models fed AI-generated data quickly spew nonsense (www.nature.com)
submitted 3 months ago by ArcticDagger@feddit.dk to c/science@lemmy.world
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

By measuring how it does with real images vs generated ones to start. The goal would be to show a method to reliably detect ai images. Gotta prove that it works.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How would it detect, you would need the model and if you do you can already detect

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's an issue with the machine learning technique, not the specific model. The hypothetical thesis would be how to use this knowledge in general.

Why are you so agitated by my off hand comment?

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 3 months ago

Am I agitated? 😂 💜 You it's not with all models no