this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
714 points (87.1% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
4800 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

35 crypto companies got together to make a change dot org petition called "Bitcoin Deserves an Emoji".

F that

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Look at my totally stable store of currency bro, trust me bro, this is totally useful as a means of exchange and you can trust in its future value bro, just believe me.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Now, overlay that price chart with a transaction count chart averaged out over say 90 days and what you will notice is that big spike up to 400 and above was at basically no transaction volume which makes it seem more like that was hype. Looking at the price chart over shorter timeframes such as a year will show you that the transaction count is actually increasing now and the price is staying quite stable.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Ignore the glaring flaws and look only at the parts I tell you to" is great fiscal policy and inspires a lot of trust. You nerds are basically sending PGP emails to each other and pretending it's money. It isn't — it's literally nothing.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, we will just have to agree to disagree.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

No, because the rest of us have to deal with the environmental destruction wrought by your virtual paperclip maximizer. it affects everyone.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Fine, go after the industries that are doing more, such as industrial processing for making glass and other things that require high temperatures, the global transportation industry, etc.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why would I "go after" an industry producing something useful, rather than grifters powering GPUs to do absolutely nothing of value? We can get to the glass industry once we've culled the useless garbage first.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Monero is CPU based. And actually we are providing something of value in that we are providing a private currency not controlled by any government where no government can tell you you can or cannot use it because they have no power to stop you from doing so. Now, whether you believe that is something we need in this world or not is a different value set.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

no government can tell you you can or cannot use it because they have no power to stop you from doing so

I mean they can kick down your door and seize or hack your PC. That threat is enough to stop most people, making the currency pretty useless in countries that have cracked down on it.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If the goons are kicking down your door, there's not a whole lot you're going to be able to do to stop them from doing so, because they will find something against you. On average, the typical US adult commits three felonies per day. So if they want you, they will get you. Obviously, that's done by making more and more things illegal to make more and more people criminals.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Why should we care what they go after? If they regulate or tax mining, that's just a difficulty adjustment that won't impact our security budget.

There's a Pareto improvement to be had here.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Your comment costs data-center energy, please help save the environment by not commenting.

Monero is mining-resistant, which means mining farms are going to be unprofitable. The people mining Monero are regular enthusiasts, so that should mean there's less wasted energy from a ton of people competing over the same number of coins. Oh, and Monero has no maximum block-size, which keeps transaction costs low (which means even less competition over mining).

I don't know of a good way to estimate Monero electricity usage, but I'm guessing it's way less than Bitcoin has per transaction, or at least it would be if they had a similar number of transactions. Monero is a lot more complex currency (so one transaction will actually spawn a bunch of "fake" transactions), but that mining-resistance is doing some work.

Here's Monero's webpage, which has some discussion on energy usage, which I think I've summarized well above.

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don’t know if this argument is the winner you thought it was. A currency where people aren’t using it as a means of exchange because of price fluctuations is a failure.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, no, hear them out. It's actually super great that when you walk into the grocery store the loaf of bread is $1.50, and by the time you walk to the bread aisle it's $0.72, and by the time you walk to the cashier it's $2.10. This is actually super great, because there's also a medium country's worth of electricity being consumed to enable that.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

When i pick up a loaf of bread its 0.012, and when i check out its 0.012. Currentsies are going to shift against each other. The exact same thing would occur if you walked into a store in, say, Germany and handed them dollars. Also, do you mind telling me how much energy the banking system uses to run their equipment, build their buildings, have their employees come to their branches, move armored trucks full of cash, etc. Like, I can understand the power use thing being an issue. But if you want to go after something that would make more of a difference, how about figuring out thermal bricks or something for industries making glass? Which produces a hell of a lot more greenhouse gases than crypto mining does. Industrial processes are a huge polluter. Or how about the global transportation system?

[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago

This is the poster child for whataboutisn. You literally just argued that it's okay for cryptocurrencies to pollute and waste energy because it takes energy to make glass too.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip -2 points 3 months ago

It fluctuates with an I narrow range, and as it gets more adoption, that range is continuing to narrow. As a matter of fact, I sell items for Monero and I keep my prices completely stable and people do come to buy things. https://xmrbazaar.com/user/shortwavesurfer2009/. I have my prices set in such a way that they will stay stable until at least December 1st of 2024 at which time I will update them if need be.