this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
116 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

73287 readers
4411 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Roman concrete would cure by reacting with the carbon dioxide in the air, fixing it into the concrete. It doesn't sound like that's how this concrete works, but I wonder if a methodology like that would be carbon negative.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For obvious reasons, I imagine that would only react on the surface level, and I'm willing to bet the CO2 generated in mining the materials, creating the concrete, and transporting the concrete outweigh some surface-level reactions with CO2.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah you need to pour it differently, in thin layers. I'm guessing that extra time might make it too expensive?

[–] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Roman methods are not how modern concrete is produced. As the article mentions, concrete production involves heating massive amounts, spewing loads of carbon dioxide & other toxins into the atmosphere.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's why I was proposing using the older method that would sequester CO2 instead of emitting it.

[–] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

I dig it!

Get back to the start with the stuff. Continue to study other ways utilize it in recycling/upcycling, but start with the carbon negative old ways at the core.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Isn’t the formula for Roman concrete unknown? I’m wondering how they can tell it is carbon negative

[–] hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Isn’t the formula for Roman concrete unknown?

Yes, though a lot of research has been done to figure out its most important properties. A secret of its durability was just figured out last year. https://news.mit.edu/2023/roman-concrete-durability-lime-casts-0106

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Interesting, thanks for sharing