Technology

37719 readers

290 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

Los@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

398

Chrome will block one of its biggest ad blockers (www.pcworld.com)

submitted 3 months ago by remington@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

100 comments fedilink hide all child comments

uBlock Origin will soon stop functioning in Chrome as Google transitions to new browser extension rules.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk 72 points 3 months ago (2 children)

At this point if you use Chrome I think there is something wrong with you.

[–] kalpol@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Every now and then a website doesn't work on Firefox.

[–] JustARegularNerd@aussie.zone 8 points 3 months ago

For me, my default browser is LibreWolf with several privacy hardening extensions, but if I do come across a website that fails, my usual route goes LibreWolf > Firefox > Ungoogled Chromium

If it doesn't work beyond that then I just won't use the website.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have that problem too but I find using a Chromium-based browser is the solution. I doubt you actually need to use Chrome for these websites you're having problems with.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

i mostly use a vivaldi or opera portable for those. unzip, run, use the temperamental site, close, delete directory. it's not very often that i have to do this.

but for a couple of pesky sites i do frequent a bit more often, i keep their portable browsers to reuse and have them configured (including addons) specifically for them.

[–] AJ1@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

well, there's a lot wrong with me. but the only reason I use chrome is because when my last windows machine took a shit, I couldn't afford a new PC so I grabbed a chromebook for $130CAD and I was seriously impressed with how easy and fast it was to use. that was 4 years ago, and now I'm just waiting for google's hammer to drop so I can switch back to windows.

a chromebook isn't without its charms, there are features that just make sense to me that are non-existent on windows: for example, you can increase the size of everything on your screen with two fingers on your touchpad. expand to make larger, pinch to shrink it down. seems like a no-brainer for any OS, but windows lacks this feature. and when you're old af and your eyesight is for shit, this is an extremely useful tool to have available.

but if I can't block ads then it's meaningless. there are no redeeming features that could ever outweigh adblock capabilities. once that happens, I'm gone and I'll never go back to chrome. they can go fuck themselves to death if they're gonna take away UO

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm (unfortunately for reasons) running Win11 on a Surface Pro 7 with keyboard, and pinch/pull to zoom works fine in Firefox and Vivaldi, which are the only apps I use the feature on. It produces funky behavior in Explorer and usually does nothing elsewhere.

Is it universally functional in Windows? No. Is it implemented at the OS level? Absolutely.